MICROSOFT 365 ACCESS & LICENCE REVIEWS

You are probably paying for Microsoft 365 licences that nobody should still have.

LicenMark runs a read-only review of your Entra ID to surface disabled licensed accounts, stale access, inactive licensed users, and other issues that usually stay hidden until someone finally asks.

Start with a one-off review report. If you are ready to proceed, you can start setup and complete onboarding directly. If you want to talk through fit first, request a review discussion.

Example review overview showing open review items, monthly value under review, and accounts covered.

Problem

Most teams are not actually reviewing Microsoft 365 access and licence waste properly.

They can pull the data. What is usually missing is a clear review that shows where spend, access, and evidence no longer hold up.

A proper review should be able to answer

  1. Which disabled accounts still hold paid licences?
  2. Which licensed users show little or no recent sign-in evidence?
  3. Which enabled accounts now look dormant or stale?
  4. Which review decisions fall apart when someone asks for the evidence?

Microsoft provides the signals. It does not package the review for you.

Why This Problem Stays Hidden

The data is there. The review usually is not.

The signals exist inside Microsoft 365 and Entra ID, but they are spread across admin views, one-off exports, and manual interpretation, so the same questions get rebuilt from scratch every time someone asks.

What This Product Is

A productised Microsoft 365 review for licence waste, stale access, and weak evidence.

Not another admin console. A read-only review that shows where licence spend, account activity, and current access no longer line up.

LicenMark turns scattered Microsoft signals into a structured review you can actually use: a current view of obvious spend exposure, stale access, and items where the evidence is still too weak to support a clean decision.

Review output

Built to be circulated, not rebuilt by hand.

The review does not stop at a dashboard view. LicenMark produces a management-ready output that can be shared internally without turning back into a spreadsheet exercise.

Example review summary document with accounts reviewed, open items, and monthly value under review.

What It Reviews

What this review is built to bring into view

Clear categories. Plain language. The point is to show what needs review, not bury you in another admin surface.

  • Disabled accounts with active paid licences Paid licences that are still assigned after access should likely have been cleaned up.
  • Licensed users with little or no recent sign-in evidence Paid licences held by accounts with no credible recent sign-in: spend without confirmed use.
  • Dormant enabled accounts Access that remains enabled even though the signals available no longer support that posture.
  • Evidence-limited review items Cases where the right answer is "review required", not a guessed outcome dressed up as certainty.
  • Review-ready reporting Structured outputs built for internal circulation and management review, not raw data dumps.

How It Works

A review process you can run once or repeat quarterly

LicenMark reads the data, applies explicit review rules, and gives you a current position you can actually use.

Read-only connection

We read Microsoft 365 and Entra ID data without changing anything in your tenant.

Rule-based review

Licences, account state, and sign-in evidence are checked using explicit rules, not guesswork.

Clear review output

You get a current review position, the items that need attention, and evidence you can export or circulate internally.

Start with a one-off review. Repeat quarterly if you want to see what changed since the last review on a regular cadence.

Trust And Safety

Safe by design

The product stays narrow on purpose. That is what makes the review easier to trust.

Non-negotiables

  • Read-only only
  • No write-back into Microsoft 365 or Entra ID
  • No auto-remediation
  • No fuzzy matching
  • No AI inference
  • No probabilistic scoring
  • No hidden per-customer logic

If the evidence is weak, the review says so clearly.

If something is uncertain, it is not smoothed over or guessed into a neat answer.

That is what makes the output usable when finance, security, or leadership want a clear position they can actually rely on.

Engagement Options

Start with a one-off review. Use quarterly reviews to track what changed.

A one-off review gives you a clear picture of current licence waste, stale access, and weak evidence.

Quarterly review is for teams that want to see what changed since the last review, what was resolved, what remains open, and what has quietly drifted back.

  • One-Off Review for a clear current readout of licence waste, stale access, and evidence-limited items
  • Quarterly Review Plan for teams that want to track change between reviews, not just repeat the same snapshot
  • The same read-only model, explicit rules, and report-ready output in both cases

This keeps the offer simple: start with clarity, then continue only if tracking change over time is genuinely useful.

Pricing

Clear pricing for a narrow review product.

LicenMark is offered as either a one-off Microsoft 365 review or a quarterly review plan. Public pricing is based primarily on Microsoft 365 environment size so buyers can see where they likely fit.

  • One-Off Review: £900 up to 150 users
  • One-Off Review: £1,400 for 151 to 500 users
  • Quarterly Review Plan: £1,500 per quarter up to 150 users
  • Quarterly Review Plan: £2,250 per quarter for 151 to 500 users
  • Custom scope above 500 users

Read-only. Deterministic. No remediation. Standard pricing covers normal environments. Unusually large or complex environments are scoped separately.

FAQ

Questions teams usually ask before they proceed

Is this an IAM platform?

No. It is a read-only access and licence review product.

Does it make changes in our tenant?

No. It does not write back, remediate, disable accounts, remove licences, or enforce policy.

Isn’t this already available in Microsoft 365?

The signals exist in Microsoft 365. The gap is turning them into a clear review output your team can actually use.

Why not just export this from Microsoft 365 or PowerShell?

Because the problem is not access to raw data. It is turning scattered Microsoft signals into a clear review with explicit findings, financial exposure, evidence separation, and report-ready output your team can actually use internally.

Is this only for identity specialists?

No. The output is for founders, CTOs, IT managers, and security leads who need a clear review position without living inside raw Microsoft admin views.

Does it rely on AI or heuristic scoring?

No. LicenMark uses explicit review rules and states uncertainty plainly where the evidence is weak.

Is this effectively a Microsoft 365 license audit?

Yes. LicenMark is a focused Microsoft 365 and Entra ID review that surfaces licence waste, stale access, inactive licensed users, and evidence gaps without changing your tenant.

Do we have to start on a quarterly plan?

No. Most teams should start with a one-off review. Quarterly only makes sense if you want to see what changed since the last review and stop the same problems quietly building up again.

How do you decide which price band applies?

Public pricing is based primarily on Microsoft 365 environment size. Up to 150 users sits in the lower band, 151 to 500 users sits in the next band, and environments above 500 users are scoped separately.

Next step

Choose the right next step for your Microsoft 365 review.

If you are ready to begin, start setup and move through the onboarding steps in a controlled way. If you want to review fit first, request a review discussion and we can discuss scope, operating model, and whether a one-off review or quarterly cadence makes sense.

Start with a one-off review. Move to quarterly only if seeing what changed between reviews is useful for your team.

You can also review the Microsoft 365 review process, the read-only security model, or the pricing bands for standard environments.